- Taking care of the baby.
- Taking care of the baby and going a little stir-crazy, although still crazy about the baby... It will get easier in the spring, or so I'm telling myself.
- Had a poem accepted for the next issue of Ghost Ocean Magazine, which was awesome news.
- Wrote two poems today, which, believe me, is not normal for the past six months. But I've written five poems since the baby was born, which is more than I expected to write.
- Considering submitting to a chapbook contest -- kind of last-minute, as I wasn't sure I had enough poems for a second chapbook and was just going to focus on the full-length manuscript, but I think I actually might, so why not?
- Working on the Spring, formerly Winter, formerly Fall/Winter issue of Melusine, which is now slated for around the 1st of April. And no joke this time, it will be out at least by Tax Day*. *Update, 4/4/13: Umm, OK, before the end of April. Eek. Did I mention that babies are time-consuming? And if we ever get a day of nice weather, I need to get myself outside, so I have to allow a day of potential Web-time for that. But the issue is coming along, little by little...
blue trajectory
janelle elyse kihlstrom, who writes poetry, book reviews and occasionally dabbles in fiction, also keeps this blog, as best she can.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
What I've Been Doing Lately
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Last Year's Resolution
Well, finally I kept them all, 100 percent of 'em. OK, there was only one, and I kept it. Boy, did I ever.
Resolution '12
Although, honestly speaking, I only kept it in some senses. I didn't completely change everything. One of the less welcome side effects of parenthood is that it seems to shine a harsher light on all one's hidden and not-so-hidden flaws, as if one's self-esteem was particularly high to begin with. I sometimes wonder how I ever fooled myself into thinking I was ever competent at anything. So needless to say, I have been writing and submitting less lately. Mostly that's about finding the time, though.
So there are a boatload of things I could resolve about this year; it's difficult to pick just one. There seem to be two categories: things I suck at (which is a mammoth category) and things I am OK/fairly good at. So I'd like to shorten the first list a bit but also put more work into the stuff in the latter one, because frankly I'll never be a Renaissance woman, and I need to choose where to put my energy. The exception there would be trying to reach out to people more and contribute more despite inhibition/social anxiety/tendency to be bad at articulating nonwritten language/sheer laziness. That's always on the list, but it's the one thing that's always worth continuing to work at, no matter how little progress I seem to make.
On that soberly prudent note, happy new year.
Resolution '12
Although, honestly speaking, I only kept it in some senses. I didn't completely change everything. One of the less welcome side effects of parenthood is that it seems to shine a harsher light on all one's hidden and not-so-hidden flaws, as if one's self-esteem was particularly high to begin with. I sometimes wonder how I ever fooled myself into thinking I was ever competent at anything. So needless to say, I have been writing and submitting less lately. Mostly that's about finding the time, though.
So there are a boatload of things I could resolve about this year; it's difficult to pick just one. There seem to be two categories: things I suck at (which is a mammoth category) and things I am OK/fairly good at. So I'd like to shorten the first list a bit but also put more work into the stuff in the latter one, because frankly I'll never be a Renaissance woman, and I need to choose where to put my energy. The exception there would be trying to reach out to people more and contribute more despite inhibition/social anxiety/tendency to be bad at articulating nonwritten language/sheer laziness. That's always on the list, but it's the one thing that's always worth continuing to work at, no matter how little progress I seem to make.
On that soberly prudent note, happy new year.
Monday, December 17, 2012
For the Holidays
It occurred to me why images of the Madonna and Child are so moving, even to me as a nontheist. After aeons of hot and cold stars and crashing meteors, in at least one place in the universe life gave rise to mammals, with their chemical capacity to bond, and then to self-conscious mammals whose look of recognition implies their shared awareness of that moment of mutual animal trust, which is kind of beautiful.
So merry Christmas, after all.
So merry Christmas, after all.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Poem
I wrote one today after all. Well, yay for encouragement from fellow poets and babies who are kind enough to sleep an extra 15 minutes or so...
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Publication and Baby Updates
So it's been a hectic three months since my last post about appearing in an upcoming anthology and expecting my first child in a matter of days.
To our delight, the child did appear in a matter of days, healthy and happy (or as happy as a newborn can be, I guess), and pretty darn cute, if I may say so from my biased vantage point, and now the anthology is out as well, and it's lovely. I just received my copy yesterday. There is an Amazon link on the press's website, if you're interested in purchasing it.
Reckless Writing: The Modernization of Poetry by Emerging Writers of the 21st Century by Chatter House Press, edited by Penny Dunning
So now I'll get back to all the things I need to cram into the few hours when baby is sleeping and mommy is not yet about to crash as well from exhaustion. Some days those things just include the essentials. I mean, the bare, bare essentials. Cleaning the house is pretty much a luxury, but then I never was much of a house-cleaner on a good day. I'm not sure how I'm going to find the time to go back to work, even part-time, but I guess I'll figure that out in a month or so. I'm working on imposing some sort of schedule on our days so that maybe I can get a bit more done. There are so many projects on my calendar, like starting work on the new issue of Melusine, book ideas, website ideas, that keep getting kicked like the proverbial can down the road. I have to admit I can't even imagine the luxury of sitting down to write a new poem yet, although I'm sort of hoping one will come to me one day despite myself, as poems sometimes do, happily for the lazy among us. But at least I've begun to send out my full-length manuscript.
For someone prone to the winter blues even in easier years, though, I have to say I'm finding life relatively good, all in all, this chilly November. The child is a handful, but she's also pretty awesome.
To our delight, the child did appear in a matter of days, healthy and happy (or as happy as a newborn can be, I guess), and pretty darn cute, if I may say so from my biased vantage point, and now the anthology is out as well, and it's lovely. I just received my copy yesterday. There is an Amazon link on the press's website, if you're interested in purchasing it.
Reckless Writing: The Modernization of Poetry by Emerging Writers of the 21st Century by Chatter House Press, edited by Penny Dunning
So now I'll get back to all the things I need to cram into the few hours when baby is sleeping and mommy is not yet about to crash as well from exhaustion. Some days those things just include the essentials. I mean, the bare, bare essentials. Cleaning the house is pretty much a luxury, but then I never was much of a house-cleaner on a good day. I'm not sure how I'm going to find the time to go back to work, even part-time, but I guess I'll figure that out in a month or so. I'm working on imposing some sort of schedule on our days so that maybe I can get a bit more done. There are so many projects on my calendar, like starting work on the new issue of Melusine, book ideas, website ideas, that keep getting kicked like the proverbial can down the road. I have to admit I can't even imagine the luxury of sitting down to write a new poem yet, although I'm sort of hoping one will come to me one day despite myself, as poems sometimes do, happily for the lazy among us. But at least I've begun to send out my full-length manuscript.
For someone prone to the winter blues even in easier years, though, I have to say I'm finding life relatively good, all in all, this chilly November. The child is a handful, but she's also pretty awesome.
Labels:
life,
Melusine,
poems published offline
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Poems Accepted for New Anthology
I just learned that four of my poems were accepted for the Reckless Writing anthology. I'm not sure if that means they seem to have been written recklessly or with reckless abandon (well, either way, it's probably a good thing for me, if I've been found erring on the side of caution and hermeticism in the past.)
In other news, baby is swiftly on her way into our world. This time next week, I will probably not be sitting at this computer, although I will no doubt have some kind of electronic device connected to the Internet close at hand, maybe even this laptop, although both I and the laptop will probably be found in a more babycentric location. Seriously, though, I'm excited. It takes a long time to grow a baby, but for the most part, it's been a fascinating ride. But now my back hurts when I sit to type, and so I'm about ready for the next phase to begin, as crazy as it no doubt will be, and also no doubt fascinating.
In other news, baby is swiftly on her way into our world. This time next week, I will probably not be sitting at this computer, although I will no doubt have some kind of electronic device connected to the Internet close at hand, maybe even this laptop, although both I and the laptop will probably be found in a more babycentric location. Seriously, though, I'm excited. It takes a long time to grow a baby, but for the most part, it's been a fascinating ride. But now my back hurts when I sit to type, and so I'm about ready for the next phase to begin, as crazy as it no doubt will be, and also no doubt fascinating.
Friday, July 20, 2012
Blue Trajectory is Reviewed in Eclectica
A new review of my chapbook, Blue Trajectory, appeared this week in the new issue of Eclectica.
I found the review, by Gilbert Wesley Purdy, to be fair and thoughtful, with some astute and useful observations. I have to admit that I had to read it twice to take in some of the most thoughtful points. I was thrown off at first by the fact that the review was combined with that of another book, a full-length collection, and that, as a thesis to link the two together, as is usually required in a combo review, a sort of comparison seemed to have been drawn between the other author's book and mine in terms of our backgrounds and our respective openness about our personal lives as revealed in our work, as well as our relative attempts at sophistication versus simplicity, two words that are used somewhat ambiguously here, I think. Is one of us good at sophistication and not so good at simplicity, with the reverse holding true of the other, or is simplicity, when done right, always to be preferred over sophistication? Since I don't think of my poems (or their author) as aiming at either sophistication or simplicity, it's hard for me to answer this question.
When I approach a review myself, I always feel a bit strange about placing too much emphasis on the author's background, especially when my knowledge of it is incomplete. In the case of mine, the (albeit reasonable) guess that I completed my MFA (or M.A., as JHU calls theirs, not that it matters much) from Hopkins in my mid-20s seems to give an impression that maybe life has been smoother for me than it has been. In fact, I received the degree at the age of 35, after a decade or so of floundering about, education and career-wise. If the last couple decades of my life were less smooth than they look on paper, there is no back-story to go along with that fact other than the usual, a temperament that needed some time and testing to find its niche.
What this means for my writing, I don't know. I know my temperament is a private one, and I guess my comfort with a certain level of privacy comes across more in my work than I realize. As a strongly introverted sort (cliche for a poet, I know, but it's true) I don't find it daring to infer my life from a distance; I find it natural and comfortable. I feel that at times the statements in my poems are very frank, but it's probably true that these statements, as the reviewer notes, stand out because they are in the minority. I also know that my approach regarding style and subject matter has probably drawn inward, rather than outward, with time. Several of the poems I published in the first year or two of beginning to place my poems were more direct in voice. Although I still write poems with the same level of directness, oddly, lately, these poems aren't picked up, and the less direct ones are. I'm not sure exactly why this is.
There may be other, more substantial differences between the two sets of poems than directness/ lack of directness, but whatever the differences are, it seems that I may be better suited to writing the latter sort of poem. The reviewer mentions transience and tenuity. I guess these concepts are in line with my philosophy of poetry and its role, as distinct from the role of narrative prose. Poetry can imitate dreamscapes by being impressionistic and fluid; it can live in the moment and not always feel the need to take a stand or draw a conclusion. Once in a while, it can or it needs to take a stand or draw a conclusion, and then it should, but I don't think this is required or would be desired of every poem.
Mr. Purdy makes a fair point in his closing comments, too. I do struggle with consistent and effective closure, and that is part of the ongoing challenge. I don't mean that cheekily; it truly is an area where I struggle, but it's also part of what keeps inspiring me.
I found the review, by Gilbert Wesley Purdy, to be fair and thoughtful, with some astute and useful observations. I have to admit that I had to read it twice to take in some of the most thoughtful points. I was thrown off at first by the fact that the review was combined with that of another book, a full-length collection, and that, as a thesis to link the two together, as is usually required in a combo review, a sort of comparison seemed to have been drawn between the other author's book and mine in terms of our backgrounds and our respective openness about our personal lives as revealed in our work, as well as our relative attempts at sophistication versus simplicity, two words that are used somewhat ambiguously here, I think. Is one of us good at sophistication and not so good at simplicity, with the reverse holding true of the other, or is simplicity, when done right, always to be preferred over sophistication? Since I don't think of my poems (or their author) as aiming at either sophistication or simplicity, it's hard for me to answer this question.
When I approach a review myself, I always feel a bit strange about placing too much emphasis on the author's background, especially when my knowledge of it is incomplete. In the case of mine, the (albeit reasonable) guess that I completed my MFA (or M.A., as JHU calls theirs, not that it matters much) from Hopkins in my mid-20s seems to give an impression that maybe life has been smoother for me than it has been. In fact, I received the degree at the age of 35, after a decade or so of floundering about, education and career-wise. If the last couple decades of my life were less smooth than they look on paper, there is no back-story to go along with that fact other than the usual, a temperament that needed some time and testing to find its niche.
What this means for my writing, I don't know. I know my temperament is a private one, and I guess my comfort with a certain level of privacy comes across more in my work than I realize. As a strongly introverted sort (cliche for a poet, I know, but it's true) I don't find it daring to infer my life from a distance; I find it natural and comfortable. I feel that at times the statements in my poems are very frank, but it's probably true that these statements, as the reviewer notes, stand out because they are in the minority. I also know that my approach regarding style and subject matter has probably drawn inward, rather than outward, with time. Several of the poems I published in the first year or two of beginning to place my poems were more direct in voice. Although I still write poems with the same level of directness, oddly, lately, these poems aren't picked up, and the less direct ones are. I'm not sure exactly why this is.
There may be other, more substantial differences between the two sets of poems than directness/ lack of directness, but whatever the differences are, it seems that I may be better suited to writing the latter sort of poem. The reviewer mentions transience and tenuity. I guess these concepts are in line with my philosophy of poetry and its role, as distinct from the role of narrative prose. Poetry can imitate dreamscapes by being impressionistic and fluid; it can live in the moment and not always feel the need to take a stand or draw a conclusion. Once in a while, it can or it needs to take a stand or draw a conclusion, and then it should, but I don't think this is required or would be desired of every poem.
Mr. Purdy makes a fair point in his closing comments, too. I do struggle with consistent and effective closure, and that is part of the ongoing challenge. I don't mean that cheekily; it truly is an area where I struggle, but it's also part of what keeps inspiring me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)